Is It Inevitable That Machines Will One Day Be Protected Like People?

NC
Ntrakwah & Co.
Contributor
Ntrakwah & Co.
The world of artificial intelligence continues to make major strides. Machines like StarryAI, DALL.E 2, and ChatGPT can learn quickly, create fascinating works of art, ...
Ghana Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The world of artificial intelligence continues to make major strides. Machines like StarryAI, DALL.E 2, and ChatGPT can learn quickly, create fascinating works of art, and even answer questions, just like a person.

However, there is a question regarding whether these machine-generated works should be protected under copyright laws.

The Copyright Act of 2005 (Act 690) in Ghana only protects literary and artistic works that are original and created by a citizen or resident of the country. The definition of an author in this act specifically refers to a person who creates a work.

It is therefore clear, that artificial intelligence systems, which are made up of algorithms designed to mimic human intelligence, cannot be considered as individuals under the law. Neither can the computers that facilitate their operations be considered as individuals. Therefore, works produced by artificial intelligence are not eligible for copyright protection under Act 690.

By: James McKeown Debrah

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Is It Inevitable That Machines Will One Day Be Protected Like People?

Ghana Intellectual Property
Contributor
Ntrakwah & Co.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More