China's Recent Export Control Blocking Rules: The Latest Paper Tiger

MF
Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd.
Contributor
Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd. logo
Since its founding in 1929, Masuda Funai has focused its practice on successfully representing international and domestic companies entering, operating and expanding in the United States. With offices in Chicago, Schaumburg and Los Angeles, the firm assists clients in every aspect of business, including establishing, acquiring, financing and selling operations and facilities; transferring overseas employees to the U.S.
China's Ministry of Commerce ("MOFCOM") issued its latest blocking statute against U.S. export controls at the beginning of this year. MOFCOM's new Rules on Counteracting...
China International Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

China's Ministry of Commerce ("MOFCOM") issued its latest blocking statute against U.S. export controls at the beginning of this year. MOFCOM's new Rules on Counteracting Unjustified Extraterritorial Application of Foreign Legislation and Other Measures ("Blocking Rules") (MOFCOM Ord. 1/2021) are designed to make it illegal in China to comply with U.S. export controls, since U.S. export controls include an arms embargo against China, and embargoes against Huawei and several other Chinese tech companies. The Blocking Rules allow the Chinese government to order Chinese companies to not comply with certain other countries' export control rules. Chinese companies will also be able to sue their non-Chinese business partners for damages due to the non-Chinese companies' continued compliance with the forbidden export controls.

Non-U.S. companies are understandably concerned about the new Blocking Rules. However, the U.S. Government and courts have never recognized foreign blocking statutes. Moreover, the Chinese Blocking Rules are quite ineffectual at combating U.S. export controls. Unlike blocking statutes in Canada and the European Union, which neutralize any efforts to freeze or seize assets of businesses and individuals in those jurisdictions, the Chinese Blocking Rules cannot stop the U.S. Government from blacklisting foreign companies that violate U.S. export controls. What this means is that a company from a third country (such as Japan or Germany) faces a choice between avoiding possible civil liability to its Chinese customer for continuing to abide by U.S. export restrictions and being cut off entirely from the supply of U.S. technology items if the U.S. Government determines that the company has violated U.S. export laws. For many companies, losing access to U.S. technology will be far more detrimental than civil liability to one or more Chinese customers.

For additional information, please contact Asa Markel or any other member of Masuda Funai's Commercial, Competition & Trade Practice Group.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

China's Recent Export Control Blocking Rules: The Latest Paper Tiger

China International Law
Contributor
Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd. logo
Since its founding in 1929, Masuda Funai has focused its practice on successfully representing international and domestic companies entering, operating and expanding in the United States. With offices in Chicago, Schaumburg and Los Angeles, the firm assists clients in every aspect of business, including establishing, acquiring, financing and selling operations and facilities; transferring overseas employees to the U.S.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More