Can A Condominium Corporation Seek Recovery Of Subrogated Interests From A Unit Owner?

MB
McCague Borlack LLP

Contributor

Established in 1994, we are one of Toronto's leading litigation law firms; and pride ourselves on being the largest insurance boutique law firm in Canada. Through our affiliation with CLC & The Harmonie Group, we service the global legal market with a wide range of practice areas and specialized knowledge.
Subrogation is the process whereby an insurer, after indemnifying its insured, assumes its insured's right to recover damages as against a tortfeaser who is liable for causing the damages.
Canada Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Subrogation is the process whereby an insurer, after indemnifying its insured, assumes its insured's right to recover damages as against a tortfeaser who is liable for causing the damages. Since the insurer's right to subrogate is derivative, the insurer is subject to the same limitations that the insured would be when seeking recovery from third parties.

It is well-settled law that an insurer cannot subrogate against its own insured, as the same policy of insurance would respond to such a claim. It is further accepted that a defendant cannot seek contribution and indemnity from a party who cannot be liable to the plaintiff for the same loss.

When determining whether a condominium corporation can pursue a subrogated claim against a unit owner, consideration must first be given to the condominium's declaration and bylaws. Often, these documents contain a covenant to insure which requires the condominium corporation to take out all-risk insurance for common elements in the names of the corporation, its employees and the owners of individual units.

For more than forty years, the case law recognizes that covenants to insure represent an allocation of risk among the parties to a contract, such that the parties cannot claim against one another for losses suffered that would be covered by the covenanted insurance. In other words, if a covenant to insure exists, a condominium corporation will likely be precluded from recovering subrogated damages from individual unit owners as they are both insured under the same policy.

The condominium declaration and/or bylaws may also contain a waiver of subrogation, whereby the condominium corporation, its employees and individual unit owners agree that they will not seek recovery of subrogated damages from each other. Such waivers may also appear in service contracts between unit owners and service contractors, and would similarly prohibit an insurer's ability to successfully subrogate against these parties.

Covenants to insure and waivers of subrogation can be used as complete bars to a plaintiff's claim. They ought to be investigated prior to issuing a subrogated claim in order to avoid incurring unnecessary fees for an action that may ultimately fail.

Subrogation is the process whereby an insurer, after indemnifying its insured, assumes its insured's right to recover damages as against a tortfeaser who is liable for causing the damages. Since the insurer's right to subrogate is derivative, the insurer is subject to the same limitations that the insured would be when seeking recovery from third parties.

It is well-settled law that an insurer cannot subrogate against its own insured, as the same policy of insurance would respond to such a claim. It is further accepted that a defendant cannot seek contribution and indemnity from a party who cannot be liable to the plaintiff for the same loss.

When determining whether a condominium corporation can pursue a subrogated claim against a unit owner, consideration must first be given to the condominium's declaration and bylaws. Often, these documents contain a covenant to insure which requires the condominium corporation to take out all-risk insurance for common elements in the names of the corporation, its employees and the owners of individual units.

For more than forty years, the case law recognizes that covenants to insure represent an allocation of risk among the parties to a contract, such that the parties cannot claim against one another for losses suffered that would be covered by the covenanted insurance. In other words, if a covenant to insure exists, a condominium corporation will likely be precluded from recovering subrogated damages from individual unit owners as they are both insured under the same policy.

The condominium declaration and/or bylaws may also contain a waiver of subrogation, whereby the condominium corporation, its employees and individual unit owners agree that they will not seek recovery of subrogated damages from each other. Such waivers may also appear in service contracts between unit owners and service contractors, and would similarly prohibit an insurer's ability to successfully subrogate against these parties.

Covenants to insure and waivers of subrogation can be used as complete bars to a plaintiff's claim. They ought to be investigated prior to issuing a subrogated claim in order to avoid incurring unnecessary fees for an action that may ultimately fail.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Can A Condominium Corporation Seek Recovery Of Subrogated Interests From A Unit Owner?

Canada Real Estate and Construction

Contributor

Established in 1994, we are one of Toronto's leading litigation law firms; and pride ourselves on being the largest insurance boutique law firm in Canada. Through our affiliation with CLC & The Harmonie Group, we service the global legal market with a wide range of practice areas and specialized knowledge.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More