COPAXONE Patents Infringed, Valid And Enforceable - U.S. District Court

BR
Beeser Ramamoorthy LLP

Contributor

Beeser Ramamoorthy LLP
The District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision that Sandoz/Momenta and Mylan/Natco infringed all of the asserted claims of Teva's glatiramer acetate patents.
Canada Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On June 22, 2012, the District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision that Sandoz/Momenta and Mylan/Natco infringed all of the asserted claims of Teva's glatiramer acetate patents and that none of the asserted claims are invalid or unenforceable. In response to paragraph IV notice letters, Teva had sued Sandoz/Momenta in 2008 and Mylan/Natco in 2009 and the two proceedings were consolidated. According to Teva's post-trial briefing, the patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 5,981,589, 6,054,430, 6,342,476, 6,362,161, 6,620,847, 6,939,539 and 7,199,098 ("the Orange Book Patents") and U.S. Patents Nos. 5,800,808, and 6,048,898, which are not listed in the Orange Book. The seven Orange Book Patents and U.S. Patent No. 6,048,898 are set to expire on May 24, 2014 a U.S. Patent No. 5,800,808 is set to expire on September 1, 2015.

The Court's opinion remains confidential pending the parties' redactions, if any.

Teva's press release announcing the decision may be found here. Momenta's press releases may be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More