ARTICLE
22 August 2022

Understanding The Risks Of Presenting Sensitive Records In Human Rights Complaints

MA
MLT Aikins LLP
Contributor
MLT Aikins LLP is a full-service law firm of more than 270 lawyers with a deep commitment to Western Canada and an understanding of this market’s unique legal and business landscapes.
In a recent decision, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal directed the Respondent company to pay $5,000 in costs to a Complainant, despite the fact that the Complainant produced no evidence of damages...
Canada Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a recent decision, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal directed the Respondent company to pay $5,000 in costs to a Complainant, despite the fact that the Complainant produced no evidence of damages or her actual legal costs.

During the course of a hearing, the Respondent company produced intimate and personal photographs of the Complainant. These photographs were "automatically uploaded" from the Complainant's work cellphone to the Respondent's "Dropbox."1 The AHRC found that there was no proof of how the photographs ended up in the Respondent's Dropbox and further found that the photographs were not relevant to the issues raised by the Complainant but were only introduced to embarrass the Complainant.2

The Commission argued that the Complainant suffered significant distress and embarrassment as a result of the photographs being introduced by the Respondent for no legitimate purpose.3 The Director further argued that the Respondent was deserving of "significant sanction and rebuke"4 and sought $5,000 in costs payable to the Complainant.5

The Respondent argued that costs should not be awarded against it for including the photographs in its submissions as they were not included in the evidence.

In determining that a $5,000 costs sanction was payable to the Complainant, the Tribunal found that "the respondent has provided no information to support a finding that it had a good faith belief that the Photographs were relevant and material to the issues raised in the Complaint. The lack of credible, good faith explanation begs the question as to the motive of the respondent in including these very personal and intimate Photographs."6

This decision underscores the importance of only producing information that is relevant and material in a hearing. Respondents should take care and use caution when responding to human rights complaints; particularly, when producing sensitive records.

Footnotes

1. Devolbren, at para 10.

2. Devolbren, at para 14.

3. Devolbren, at para 15.

4. Devolbren, at para 17.

5. Devolbren, at para 18.

6. Devolbren, at paras 26 – 27

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
22 August 2022

Understanding The Risks Of Presenting Sensitive Records In Human Rights Complaints

Canada Employment and HR
Contributor
MLT Aikins LLP is a full-service law firm of more than 270 lawyers with a deep commitment to Western Canada and an understanding of this market’s unique legal and business landscapes.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More