ARTICLE
20 November 2019

Why Are Well-Capitalized Litigants Increasingly Turning To Dispute Funding?

BI
Bentham IMF Capital Limited
Contributor
Bentham IMF Capital Limited logo
Bentham IMF provides litigation finance and investment capital to plaintiffs and law firms for large commercial disputes in Canada and for international arbitration. As the Canadian arm of IMF Bentham Limited, we are one of the oldest and most experienced commercial funders in the world. We offer law firms and their clients a risk sharing partnership and a proven record of success as a leading global litigation funder.
We are frequently asked why a well-capitalized corporate entity would use litigation funding.
Canada Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

We are frequently asked why a well-capitalized corporate entity would use litigation funding. A recent article published by Institutional Investor provides some answers. The article features recent cases where two large U.S. institutional investors, CalSTRS and Texas Teachers, partnered with Bentham IMF to recover losses they suffered as shareholders in Danish companies accused of fraud.

The rationale behind their decision to use funding applies to other well-resourced litigants. The following reasons are often mentioned by well-capitalized businesses when deciding to partner with a funder:

1) Large claims are assets. Good corporate governance requires that a business at least explore whether it should expend resources to go after that asset.

2) When making this assessment, corporations will consider the investment and what ROI they will derive from it. The investment includes all of the costs to bring a claim to completion and enforce it, including lawyers' and experts' fees, but also the potential liability arising from a loss (exposure to adverse costs).

3) If a corporation would obtain a better ROI by investing those funds in its core business rather than in the litigation, funding is an option which should be explored.

4) Management may experience budget fatigue along the way. Working with a funder ensures that the capital is available to see the case through to the end, regardless of business priorities that might change.

5) By using the funder's money to pay for the litigation, a corporation can take the litigation expenses off its balance sheet. When a claim is successful, revenues can be recorded (typically as an exceptional item) without the company having incurred any cost along the way. If the claim is unsuccessful, as capital was provided by the funder on a non-recourse basis, the company pays nothing.

This risk-free model can be very attractive, especially for in-house counsel who are being asked to trim costs and find creative solutions to do more with less. Litigation funding allows legal departments to become profit centers. As the assistant general counsel at Texas Teachers put it in the article linked above, "when does legal get to say we made money?"

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
20 November 2019

Why Are Well-Capitalized Litigants Increasingly Turning To Dispute Funding?

Canada Corporate/Commercial Law
Contributor
Bentham IMF Capital Limited logo
Bentham IMF provides litigation finance and investment capital to plaintiffs and law firms for large commercial disputes in Canada and for international arbitration. As the Canadian arm of IMF Bentham Limited, we are one of the oldest and most experienced commercial funders in the world. We offer law firms and their clients a risk sharing partnership and a proven record of success as a leading global litigation funder.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More