ARTICLE
14 November 2014

The Full Court of the Federal Court finds computer-implemented invention not patentable

SF
Spruson & Ferguson

Contributor

Established in 1887, Spruson & Ferguson is a leading intellectual property (IP) service provider in the Asia-Pacific region, with offices in Australia, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. They offer high-quality services to clients and are part of the IPH Limited group, which includes various professional service firms operating under different brands in multiple jurisdictions. Spruson & Ferguson is an incorporated entity owned by IPH Limited, with a strong presence in the industry.
The Full Court's decision attempts to clarify the patentability of computer-implemented inventions under Australian law.
Australia Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Full Court of the Federal Court has dismissed the patent applicant's appeal in Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150 (link), finding that the computer-implemented inventions in issue were not patentable subject matter under Australian law.

The case concerned patent claims for computer-implemented methods and systems for generating financial securities indexes based on objective measures other than share price and market capitalisation. The indexes generated were used by investment managers to create and maintain securities portfolios.

The Full Court upheld the single judge's decision in Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents (2013) 300 ALR 724; [2013] FCA 71 (link), which held that the claims in issue did not claim patentable subject matter. The single judge's decision was the subject of our earlier IP Alert, available here ( link).

The Full Court's decision attempts to clarify the patentability of computer-implemented inventions under Australian law. In reaching its decision, the Full Court undertook a detailed review of, and had particular regard to, the law in the United Kingdom and the United States.

We will publish further analysis of the decision shortly.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More