Introduction
In this edition of Expert Matters, Sally Davitt, a Director in our Sydney office, considers a recent case where both parties objected to the admissibility of the evidence of 12 different experts part way through the trial and just as they were about to enter the 'hot tub' to give concurrent evidence.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.