Court Finds Mailpost Posties Mislead

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
December 2009, the ACCC instituted proceedings in the Federal Court in Sydney against Mailpost Australia Limited (Mailpost), its director Mr Peter Kritas and its NSW sub franchisor Mailpost Postie Network Sydney Pty Ltd (MPNS) for alleged breaches of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (the Act).
Australia Criminal Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Mailpost is a print and distribution business for unaddressed promotional mail. In December 2009, the ACCC instituted proceedings in the Federal Court in Sydney against Mailpost Australia Limited (Mailpost), its director Mr Peter Kritas and its NSW sub franchisor Mailpost Postie Network Sydney Pty Ltd (MPNS) for alleged breaches of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (the Act).

The ACCC argued that Mailpost and MPNS breached the Franchising Code of Conduct (the Code) and section 51AD of the Act by failing to provide prospective franchisees with a disclosure document. In addition, the ACCC alleged that Mailpost and MPNS made a number of false, misleading and deceptive representations to franchisees and prospective franchisees including that:

  • the Mailpost business was not a franchise
  • the Franchisees did not have rights under the Code
  • additional franchise revenue streams would be provided to the franchisees
  • the business was "probably the fastest growing franchise type operating in the whole world"
  • the business was "recession proof"
  • Mailpost has a number of corporate customers "on the way".

The ACCC sought orders including declarations that Mailpost engaged in conduct that contravenes the Act with the knowledge of Mr Kritas, injunctions, costs and the implementation of a trade practices compliance program by Mailpost and MPNS.

Earlier this month, the Federal Court declared that Mailpost founder Peter Kritas and Mailpost were both in breach of the Code and granted each of the orders sought by the ACCC (above).

Warning to franchisors

This result serves as a clear warning to all franchisors, highlighting the perils of failing to comply with the Franchising Code. ACCC Chairman Graeme Samuels stressed that "the ACCC will not hesitate to take court action against franchisors and associated individuals that use misleading statements when attempting to recruit new franchisees to a franchise operation."

Franchisors are well advised to ensure that they comply with the Code and if in doubt, are encouraged to seek independent legal advice. Middletons provides full service franchise specific legal advice to many franchised business in Australia and around the world.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Court Finds Mailpost Posties Mislead

Australia Criminal Law

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More