ARTICLE
27 April 2021

A recent case concerning forged signatures, the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) and misleading and deceptive conduct

Summary of recent interesting case against a builder and an insurance broker.
Australia Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In The Owners – Strata Plan No 87265 v Saaib; The Owners – Strata Plan No 87265 v Alexandrova [2021] NSWSC 150, an Owners Corporation brought proceedings against a builder and an insurance broker. The Owners Corporation contracted Mr Saaib (builder) to do residential work on the common property. The Owners Corporation alleged that this work breached warranties in the Home Building Act (NSW). It was common ground that the builder's nephew had forged his signature on many documents, but the Owners Corporation alleged that the builder authorised his nephew to enter the contract on his behalf.

Furthermore, the Owners Corporation alleged that Ms Alexandrova (insurance broker) had engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, by submitting home builders insurance without authorisation. This led the Owners Corporation to believe that the builder had valid insurance for any building defects.

The Court was not satisfied that the builder authorised his nephew to enter into the contract. Furthermore, there could not have been any breach of the warranties in the Home Building Act, because the builder had not started the works, or supervised any other party to start the works. However, the insurance broker was found liable. She made representations that she was permitted to apply for home builders insurance. She was not just passing on information, but in her dealings with other parties, she put herself out as representing the builder. Although she did not know the documents had forged signatures, she had nevertheless inducted third parties into a false belief.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
27 April 2021

A recent case concerning forged signatures, the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) and misleading and deceptive conduct

Australia Real Estate and Construction

Contributor

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More