ARTICLE
10 March 2020

Federal Court Releases Reasons In TPG & Vodafone Merger Case

Herbert Smith Freehills' team advised TPG, once again assisting a client to obtain merger clearance in the face of ACCC opposition
Australia Antitrust/Competition Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Herbert Smith Freehills' team advised TPG, once again assisting a client to obtain merger clearance in the face of ACCC opposition.

On 13 February 2020, the Federal Court of Australia declared that the proposed merger between TPG Telecom Limited (TPG) and Vodafone Hutchison Australia (Vodafone) would not have the likely effect of substantially lessening competition in the retail mobile market, and therefore would not contravene of section 50 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA). 

Subject to any ACCC appeal (which must be lodged by 12 March 2020), the Court's decision effectively overrules the ACCC's May 2019 decision to oppose the transaction, and provides TPG and Vodafone with competition clearance to proceed with the proposed $15 billion merger.

The HSF contested mergers team assisted TPG in achieving this great outcome. With this recent success, the HSF contested mergers team has acted in and won five of the seven contested merger cases in the last 15 years.

Our update summarises Middleton J's findings on the three issues critical to the Court's decision, focusing on the key TPG evidence.

Click here to view the file.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More