Court Of Appeal Sets Aside Financial Penalties Imposed By MyCC On MAS And AirAsia

S
SKRINE

Contributor

SKRINE logo
Skrine is one of the oldest, largest and most awarded legal firms in the country, with a sterling global reputation, and a wide range of highly-regarded practice groups. The firm is currently led by 50 partners with over 110 lawyers.
The Competition Appeal Tribunal ("CAT") is an appellate authority and MyCC must abide by its decision.
Malaysia Antitrust/Competition Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
The Court of Appeal delivered a decision on 27 April 2021 allowing the appeals by Malaysian Airline System Berhad ("MAS") and AirAsia Berhad ("AirAsia") to set aside financial penalties of RM10 million each imposed by the Malaysia Competition Commission ("MyCC") on MAS and AirAsia for breach of the Competition Act 2010 ("the Act") by entering into a collaboration agreement on sharing markets in the air transport services in Malaysia.
 
Based on news reports1, the grounds for the Court of Appeal's decision are as follows

 

  1. The  Competition Appeal Tribunal ("CAT") is an appellate authority and MyCC must abide by its decision. MyCC cannot ignore or challenge the decision of the appellate authority unless it is expressly provided by the Parliament.

 

  1. MyCC is not an aggrieved party under Order 53 rule 2 of the Rules of Court 2012 and is therefore not entitled to seek a judicial review of CAT's decision.

 

  1. MyCC had not shown that CAT's decision to overturn the RM10 million fine imposed on each of the airlines was irrational and the threshold for leave to commence judicial review had not been met by MyCC.

 

  1. The collaboration agreement between the parties was entered into before the Act came into force and therefore it was "perfectly lawful" to discuss such agreement at the material time.

In light of the grounds set out in paragraphs 1 and 2, the ground set out in paragraph 3 may be an alternative ground of decision or be obiter dicta.  

 
By way of background, MyCC had imposed the fines on both airlines in 2014 after it found that both AirAsia and MAS breached the market sharing prohibition under Section 4(2) of the Act. On appeal by both airlines, CAT overturned MyCC's decision to impose the fines in 2016. Following that, MyCC then sought a judicial review of CAT's decision which resulted in the fines being reimposed by the High Court in 2018.
 
A more detailed commentary will be published when the Court of Appeal's grounds of judgment are available.

Footnote

1 'AirAsia and MAS manage to set aside RM10m fines', The Edge Markets (theedgemarkets.com), 27 April 2021 and 'MAS, Airasia win appeals to quash RM10 million fine over market-sharing prohibition breach', The New Straits Times (nst.com.my), 27 April 2021.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More