ARTICLE
30 September 2022

Unfair Marketing: Ecolabeling

R
Rouse
Contributor
Rouse is an IP services business focused on emerging markets. We operate as a closely integrated network to provide the full range of intellectual property services, from patent and trade mark protection and management to commercialisation, global enforcement and anti-counterfeiting.
The Patent and Trademark Court of Appeal (PMÖD) has prohibited a company from claiming in advertising, for example on Instagram, that their products are certified with an environmental label without, in connection with the claim, informing what the label means.
Sweden Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Do you refer to environmental labeling in your marketing?

The Patent and Trademark Court of Appeal (PMÖD) has prohibited a company from claiming in advertising, for example on Instagram, that their products are certified with an environmental label without, in connection with the claim,  informing what the label means. That one of the labels referred to by the company; "Ecocert COSMOS" is one of the most common environmental labels for cosmetic products in Sweden has not been considered sufficient to constitute an exception.

As a starting point, it is not enough to only briefly refer to a third-party certification. PMÖD made the assessment that it cannot be expected that an average consumer knows the meaning or importance of various private certifications. The fact that the label appears in the Consumer Agency's information to consumers does not show that consumers are aware of its meaning, stated PMÖD in the judgment.

An information about certification must be supplemented with information about the meaning of the certification in connection with the claim. It is not enough that an explanation can be found, for example, on the company's website when the marketing takes place in other channels, such as Instagram, the company needs to inform the consumer in direct connection with the claim about what the certification means. In the case of advertising on, for example, Instagram, the explanation should therefore appear directly in the post.

The Patent and Market Court of Appeal ruled that the company's failure to inform about the meaning of the certification meant that the marketing was misleading and in violation of the Marketing Act. The marketing was thus also inappropriate.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
30 September 2022

Unfair Marketing: Ecolabeling

Sweden Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Contributor
Rouse is an IP services business focused on emerging markets. We operate as a closely integrated network to provide the full range of intellectual property services, from patent and trade mark protection and management to commercialisation, global enforcement and anti-counterfeiting.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More