ARTICLE
3 August 2023

New Trump Charges Highlight Long-Running Questions About Obstruction

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
Brandon Van Grack spoke to the New York Times about the accusation that former President Trump wanted security camera footage deleted at Mar-a-Lago, adding to a pattern of concerns...
United States Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Brandon Van Grack spoke to the New York Times about the accusation that former President Trump wanted security camera footage deleted at Mar-a-Lago, adding to a pattern of concerns about his attempts to stymie prosecutors.

"There are all sorts of ways to obstruct an investigation, but not every one has an equal impact," Brandon said. "Hiding and lying are damaging, but prosecutors can often still get at the truth. Destruction is often looked at seriously because it's permanent. It's permanently deleting or destroying" evidence in the case.

Read the full article (subscription may be required).

Originally published by New York Times

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More