ARTICLE
26 March 2024

NAPFM, AIMA, And MFA File Complaint Against SEC's New Dealer Rule

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
On 18 March 2024, the National Association of Private Fund Managers, Alternative Investment Management Association, Limited and Managed Funds Association...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 18 March 2024, the National Association of Private Fund Managers, Alternative Investment Management Association, Limited and Managed Funds Association (together, Plaintiffs) jointly filed a complaint (Complaint) against the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleging that the SEC's newly adopted final rule (Dealer Rule) vastly overstepped and expanded the SEC's authority. The Complaint, which was filed in federal court in Texas, details how the Dealer Rule, expanding those industry participants who would be "dealers" under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is overbroad and was adopted in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act.

The Complaint describes previously failed SEC efforts to impose registration on private funds, which Congress has purposely exempted from federal registration. According to the Plaintiffs, the Dealer Rule is an attempt by the SEC to (again) try and force their "aggressive agenda" on private funds. The Complaint alleges that the Dealer Rule places unnecessary regulatory burdens on private funds and would irrationally decrease liquidity. Among other things, private funds would be subject to dealer requirements including net capital rules and the prohibition on IPO investing; would lose protections afforded to them as customers of executing broker-dealers; and would be required to rewrite their governing documents to give their investors less favorable terms. In support of their arguments, Plaintiffs cite Commissioners Peirce's and Uyeda's critical dissents to the Dealer Rule.

The Complaint marks the first significant legal challenge to the Dealer Rule, which could have implications for other SEC rulemakings. As of now, the suit has no impact on the effectiveness of the Dealer Rule, although the Court could issue a stay.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More