ARTICLE
19 October 2023

SEC's New Cyber Disclosure Rule: Challenges, Consequences, And Compliance

KI
K2 Integrity

Contributor

K2 Integrity is the preeminent risk, compliance, investigations, and monitoring firm built by industry leaders, driven by interdisciplinary teams, and supported by cutting-edge technology to safeguard our clients’ operations, reputations, and economic security. K2 Integrity represents the merger of K2 Intelligence, an industry-leading investigative, compliance, and cyber defense services firm founded in 2009 by Jeremy M. Kroll and Jules B. Kroll, the originator of the modern corporate investigations industry, and Financial Integrity Network (FIN), a premier strategic advisory firm founded by Juan Zarate and Chip Poncy dedicated to helping clients achieve their financial integrity goals.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) impending cyber disclosure rule, slated to commence on 15 December 2023, underscores an imperative shift towards a more transparent and accountable cybersecurity posture for public entities.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) impending cyber disclosure rule, slated to commence on 15 December 2023, underscores an imperative shift towards a more transparent and accountable cybersecurity posture for public entities. The rules also apply to foreign private issuers that are listed in the U.S. markets. This mandate brings to the table both an opportunity for enhanced investor trust and significant challenges regarding timely cyber incident reporting and meaningful disclosures. The rule comes at a time when cybersecurity threats are increasing in frequency, sophistication, and impact, posing significant challenges for businesses and governments alike. Cyber attacks are among the top global risks in terms of likelihood and impact.

The Rule at a Glance

The SEC's rule mandates public entities to:

  • Report material cyber incidents within four business days after ascertaining their materiality.
  • Detail their cybersecurity strategies, processes, and governance mechanisms in annual reports.
  • Tag these disclosures with Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language (Inline XBRL) for easy access and analysis by stakeholders

Consequences of Nonadherence

Noncompliance can precipitate:

  • SEC Enforcement Actions: These can include penalties, registration revocations, or cease-and-desist mandates.
  • Investor Litigation: Investors might seek redressal for perceived negligence or fraudulent nondisclosure, impacting companies both financially and reputationally.
  • Reputational Damage: A breach in trust can erode stakeholder confidence and potentially lead to a decline in market performance and stakeholder relations.

Challenges in Comprehension and Execution

  1. Determining Materiality in Real Time: Cybersecurity incidents usually exhibit a layered complexity. Gauging the breadth, impact, and origin of an incident could span weeks or even months. Expecting companies to relay unknown details within four days after determining the incident's materiality—which itself must be done without "unreasonable delay"—may be unrealistic, causing any reporting to be prone to inaccuracy and potentially taxing on the company.
  2. Striking the Security-Disclosure Balance: A disclosure paradox exists: Relaying extensive incident details may jeopardize security by offering attackers insights, while, conversely, minimal disclosure can dent the firm's credibility. Companies must meticulously balance disclosure needs against security and privacy imperatives.

Essential Cybersecurity Capabilities for Compliance

To be compliance-ready, companies should examine their cybersecurity framework against the following capabilities and work to strengthen any weak spots:

  • Enhanced Disclosure Controls: Capabilities such as threat intelligence and incident detection can inform the decision-making process, assisting companies in making accurate and timely disclosures about cybersecurity risks and events, as mandated by the SEC.
  • Risk Management: Essential cybersecurity capabilities like vulnerability assessment, risk profiling, and data classification directly contribute to developing robust risk management policies. These capabilities align well with the SEC's emphasis on identifying, assessing, and managing cybersecurity risks.
  • Timely Information Sharing: Incident response and recovery capabilities facilitate quick action and communication in the event of a cybersecurity incident. This aligns with the SEC's requirements for timely public disclosure and could mitigate potential legal repercussions.
  • Data Integrity: Data encryption, regular audits, and secure data storage ensure the confidentiality and integrity of material nonpublic information. These capabilities are pivotal for compliance with SEC regulations on data protection.
  • Accountability and Governance: Tools for compliance management and reporting features integrated into essential cybersecurity capabilities can simplify the process of adhering to SEC requirements by providing a centralized system for accountability and governance.

Conclusion

While the SEC's cyber disclosure rule promises to reshape the transparency landscape of public companies vis-à-vis cybersecurity, it also entails an array of operational challenges. Organizations need to bolster their cybersecurity capabilities, ensuring they can prevent, detect, respond, and recover from cyber incidents effectively. Straddling the fine line between informative disclosure and security imperatives will be key to ensuring regulatory compliance while safeguarding stakeholder interests.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
19 October 2023

SEC's New Cyber Disclosure Rule: Challenges, Consequences, And Compliance

United States Corporate/Commercial Law

Contributor

K2 Integrity is the preeminent risk, compliance, investigations, and monitoring firm built by industry leaders, driven by interdisciplinary teams, and supported by cutting-edge technology to safeguard our clients’ operations, reputations, and economic security. K2 Integrity represents the merger of K2 Intelligence, an industry-leading investigative, compliance, and cyber defense services firm founded in 2009 by Jeremy M. Kroll and Jules B. Kroll, the originator of the modern corporate investigations industry, and Financial Integrity Network (FIN), a premier strategic advisory firm founded by Juan Zarate and Chip Poncy dedicated to helping clients achieve their financial integrity goals.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More