Third Central Division Of The Unified Patent Court To Be Established In Milan

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
As reported earlier this year (see our blog post), it had long remained unclear where the third seat of the Central Division will be established after the United Kingdom decided to leave the European Union and the Unified Patent Court (UPC) system.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

As reported earlier this year (see our blog post), it had long remained unclear where the third seat of the Central Division will be established after the United Kingdom decided to leave the European Union and the Unified Patent Court (UPC) system. Milan was long discussed as potential successor of the Central Division's London seat.

After the UPC having provided an interim solution by splitting the cases of the former London section between the Paris and Munich seats of the Central Division, the UPC's Administrative Committee has now decided that the third seat of the Central Division shall be established in Milan.

Originally the London section of the Central Division was supposed to hear cases on human necessities, chemistry and metallurgy. However, a reallocation of cases pending at the Central Division was also decided:

  • Milan shall hear only cases with regards to human necessities, without Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs);
  • Munich will in addition to its originally assigned competences for mechanical engineering, lighting, heating, weapons and blasting also hear cases on chemistry and metallurgy without SPCs; and
  • Paris being originally competent to hear cases on performing operations, transporting, textiles, paper, fixed constructions, physics and electricity shall additionally also be competent for SPCs.

These changes require an amendment of Art. 7(2) and Annex II of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA), meaning that the decision of the Administrative Committee shall not take effect if a Contracting Member State declares within twelve months of the date of the decision, that it does not wish to be bound by the decision (Art. 87(3) UPCA). In view of this the Administrative Committee noted: "In bona fide and without prejudice to Article 87(3) UPCA, preparatory work will start upon the adoption of this decision to ensure that the amendments that are the subject matter of the decision are fully and immediately operational at the moment of its entry into effect." And the Italian Government announced that it is already "working to make the Milan Section fully operational within the timeframe envisaged by the Agreement (12 months under Art. 87.3)".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Third Central Division Of The Unified Patent Court To Be Established In Milan

United States Intellectual Property

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More