ARTICLE
9 February 2022

SEP/FRAND Disputes: Arbitration Or Litigation?

AG
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Contributor
Akin is a law firm focused on providing extraordinary client service, a rewarding environment for our diverse workforce and exceptional legal representation irrespective of ability to pay. The deep transactional, litigation, regulatory and policy experience we bring to client engagements helps us craft innovative, effective solutions and strategies.
Disputes as to the licensing of standard-essential patents (SEP) and determination of fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms are typically resolved through either negotiation or litigation in national courts.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Disputes as to the licensing of standard-essential patents (SEP) and determination of fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms are typically resolved through either negotiation or litigation in national courts. However, international arbitration is increasingly being used as an alternative to litigation, a trend endorsed in recent statements by both the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the U.K. Government.

Depending on the circumstances, arbitration may have significant advantages – for example, it may reduce the likelihood of parallel proceedings in multiple jurisdictions and of extensive discovery, and may increase the likelihood of a suitably neutral and expert tribunal and of a swifter and cheaper route to a final determination. Equally, there may be benefits in referring some issues to arbitration and others to litigation (e.g. parties might agree to arbitrate disputes about whether the relevant technology is covered by SEPs and/or what the FRAND price/rate should be, leaving any issues around infringement and invalidity for subsequent litigation).

Both sides need to agree on arbitration in order for this route to be available. Therefore, when SEP/FRAND disputes arise it is important that patent owners and prospective licensees have in mind that there may be an option to litigate or arbitrate, be in a position to weigh-up which route or combination of routes is to be preferred and to engage the other side in discussion before litigation is commenced.

The purpose of this note is briefly to outline the headline considerations that should be taken into account, so that owners and prospective licensees are equipped to make an informed choice. A brief summary of publicly known SEP/FRAND arbitrations is set out at the end of this note.

(Table images)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
9 February 2022

SEP/FRAND Disputes: Arbitration Or Litigation?

United States Intellectual Property
Contributor
Akin is a law firm focused on providing extraordinary client service, a rewarding environment for our diverse workforce and exceptional legal representation irrespective of ability to pay. The deep transactional, litigation, regulatory and policy experience we bring to client engagements helps us craft innovative, effective solutions and strategies.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More