FTC Calls Out Bill Payment Company's Use Of Dark Pattern Practices

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
On April 25, the FTC took action against a Washington-based bill payment company and its two co-founders alleging that the company used misleading search ads to impersonate consumers' billers and deceptive design.
United States Technology
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On April 25, the FTC took action against a Washington-based bill payment company and its two co-founders alleging that the company used misleading search ads to impersonate consumers' billers and deceptive design practices to mislead those consumers into paying "junk fees" they tacked on to consumers' bills.

In a complaint filed in the Western District of Washington, the FTC alleged that the company employed misleading "dark pattens" to manipulate consumers into using their platform under the mistaken belief that they had reached their biller's official payment site. Once on the false site, the bill payment company would charge "junk fees" in connection with the processing of payments. The FTC also claimed defendants violated the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act by charging consumers for goods or services before clearly and conspicuously disclosing all materials to the transaction, and obtaining the consumers' informed consent, as well as deceptively enrolling consumers into a paid subscription service. The FTC also alleged that the company caused consumers to incur late fees by failing to make timely payments to the consumers' billers despite having received on time payments from the consumer. Finally, the FTC also alleged defendants used fraudulent statements and representations to obtain consumer information such as bank account numbers, in violation of the Graham-Leach-Blilely Act.

Putting It Into Practice: As we have previously reported, this settlement underscores the FTC's continue push to tackle the use of dark pattern techniques to manipulate consumer activity through confusing and misleading enrollment and cancellation processes (see our previous blog posts here, here, here, here, and here, as well as our webinar titled "Who Turned Out the Lights?: FTC Steps Up 'Dark Patterns' Enforcement of Retailers" on this topic). Companies that utilize subscriptions programs, especially those that operate with negative renewal or negative option plans, should ensure that they are providing clear disclosures to consumers wishing to enroll, alter or cancel their services.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

FTC Calls Out Bill Payment Company's Use Of Dark Pattern Practices

United States Technology

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More