NLRB Settles Noncompete Regulatory Action

JB
Jenner & Block

Contributor

Jenner & Block is a law firm of international reach with more than 500 lawyers in six offices. Our firm has been widely recognized for producing outstanding results in corporate transactions and securing significant litigation victories from the trial level through the United States Supreme Court.
In May 2023, the General Counsel of the NLRB published a memorandum stating that an employer who requires a nonmanagerial/nonsupervisory employee to sign a noncompete agreement violates Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In May 2023, the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") published a memorandum stating that an employer who requires a nonmanagerial/nonsupervisory employee to sign a noncompete agreement violates Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (except in certain narrow circumstances). The General Counsel's memorandum instructed the NLRB's regional offices to seek out unfair labor practice charges against employers who utilize overbroad noncompete requirements.

In what appears to be a test case following the General Counsel's memorandum, the regional director of the NLRB's Region 9 office in Cincinnati, Ohio brought charges in September 2023 against a spa/cosmetic-and-medical business that required certain low level employees to sign an agreement that contained two year noncompete and non-solicit provisions, along with a promise to repay the employer for training that the employee received if the employee departed within two years of being hired. Harper Holdings, LLC d/b/a Juvly Aesthetics, Case No. 09-CA-300239. In October 2023, Harper Holdings moved to dismiss the charges against it, arguing among other things that there was no legal precedent for the NLRB's position, that employers have legitimate business reasons to utilize noncompete arrangements, and that the NLRB's position was contrary to decades of Ohio law regarding noncompetes.

The NLRB announced a settlement of the dispute on February 6, 2024. As part of the settlement, according to the NLRB's announcement, Harper Holdings "agreed to rescind the unlawful policies, cease its demands for training repayments, to pay more than $25,000 in monetary relief to two employees affected by the Employer's unlawful discharge and withholding of benefits, post a remedial Notice to Employees across all of its facilities in the United States, and post a copy of the Notice to its Slack messaging application."

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

NLRB Settles Noncompete Regulatory Action

United States Employment and HR

Contributor

Jenner & Block is a law firm of international reach with more than 500 lawyers in six offices. Our firm has been widely recognized for producing outstanding results in corporate transactions and securing significant litigation victories from the trial level through the United States Supreme Court.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More