ARTICLE
22 December 2022

AI Trends For 2023 - Generative AI In The Spotlight

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
Technology companies, researchers, content creators, and lawmakers will continue to grapple with the thorny copyright issues related to artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic outputs.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Technology companies, researchers, content creators, and lawmakers will continue to grapple with the thorny copyright issues related to artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic outputs. In 2023, we expect to see continued litigation and policy discussions regarding the following topics.

  • Authorship of AI algorithm generated works. In 2022, the U.S. Copyright Review Board confirmed that copyright protection only extends to works of human authorship and rejected a copyright registration for an image created entirely by an AI. What has not been answered is how much a human can use AI tools in the creation of a work before that work will no longer be considered a work of a human author.
  • Whether the outputs from certain deep learning AI systems can infringe copyrighted works. In the United States, copyright infringement occurs when anyone violates the exclusive rights of the copyright owner. Courts also require the infringement to result from the defendant's "volitional conduct," though courts differ in their interpretation of what that means. In 2023, we expect debate regarding whether infringement occurs where outputs of sophisticated deep learning AI systems are attenuated from anyone's (i.e., a human's) volitional act.
  • Use of copyrighted works as training data for machine learning (ML). ML requires massive amounts of machine training data. Whether courts agree that the use of copyrighted materials as training data qualifies as fair use will be, as was the case with other disruptive technologies, critical to the future of AI innovation.

Mofo Tech Blog - A blog dedicated to information, trend-spotting & analysis for science & tech-based companies

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
22 December 2022

AI Trends For 2023 - Generative AI In The Spotlight

United States Intellectual Property

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More