ARTICLE
17 October 2018

The Money That Cost Too Much – Unexplained Wealth Orders (Update)

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
The target of the UK's first unexplained wealth order (UWO) has been made public after reporting restrictions expired last week.
UK Criminal Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The target of the UK's first unexplained wealth order (UWO) has been made public after reporting restrictions expired last week.  Mrs Zamira Hajiyeva will now be required to provide the National Crime Agency with proof of the legitimacy of funds used to purchase two properties worth £22 million, a property in Knightsbridge and a golf course near Ascot.

Mrs Hajiyeva was identified as the wife of Jahangir Hajiyeva, a retired chairman of the International Bank of Azerbaijan. Mr Hajiyeva is currently serving a 15-year sentence in Baku after being convicted of a number of offences, including embezzlement, abuse of office, and fraud. In addition to his imprisonment, Mr Hajiyeva has had to pay penalties totaling approximately £30 million.

As noted in our earlier client alert, " Show Me The Money! Unexplained Wealth Orders in the UK", UWOs may be issued on the request of regulators against property valued in excess of £50,000 if the respondent is a Politically Exposed Person (PEP). Controversially, a UWO made in relation to a PEP outside the European Economic Area would not require suspicion of serious criminality. Furthermore, once a UWO is issued by the High Court, the burden of proof is reversed. Therefore, there is now a presumption, unless successfully rebutted by Mrs Hajiyeva, that the properties were bought with illegitimate funds.  The use of UWOs so soon after the power was brought into force would suggest that they will become a common tool for regulators to police potential proceeds of crime in the UK economic system; however, how successful they are remains to be seen. 

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
17 October 2018

The Money That Cost Too Much – Unexplained Wealth Orders (Update)

UK Criminal Law

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More