ARTICLE
7 August 2023

Batman Won Another (Trade Mark) Battle

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
Batman may be a superhero but it is the General Court who has come to the rescue following an invalidation action bought against DC Comics, Warner Bros subsidiary...
UK Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Batman may be a superhero but it is the General Court who has come to the rescue following an invalidation action bought against DC Comics, a Warner Bros subsidiary, by Commerciale Italiana Srl, a wholesale retailer of costumes. In 2019, the Italian company applied for the invalidation of the well-known Batman logo (EUTM 000038158) for some of the goods in classes 25 and 28 (including clothing, footwear, and costumes), based on lack of distinctive character.

The Case

The invalidation action was refused by the EUIPO and subsequently by the EUIPO board of appeal. The reasoning given by the EUIPO for the refusal was that despite the somewhat original arguments put forward by the invalidation applicant the fact that the mark "is associated with a fictitious character does not, in itself, make it possible to rule out that that mark can also serve as an indication of the origin of the goods in question."

In order for an invalidation action to be successful, the applicant must first prove that the trademark was non-distinctive at the time of filing. However, in this case none of the evidence submitted by the Commerciale Italiana proved that when the trademark application was filed back in 1996, the relevant public would not have associated the Batman logo with DC Comics. On this basis, the argument according to which the Batman character cannot be depicted without the Batman logo was unsuccessful. In fact, the popularity of Batman as a fictional character strengthens the origin function of the Batman logo, and consumers recognise the origin function of the trademark and rely on it for their commercial decisions.

Following the refusal by the EUIPO board of appeal, Commerciale Italiana turned to the General Court. However, the court upheld the EUIPO's decision, ruling that "the evidence submitted to the General Court is not sufficient to show that the Batman logo was devoid of distinctive character or associated with another commercial origin on the date of filing" and that the mark is in fact distinctive for the goods of interest. Although, a further appeal to the Court of Justice is available, it seems unlikely as Commercial Italiana is now in liquidation and there may no longer be a commercial interest in pursuing this case.

Takeaways

This decision is welcomed by right holders of well-known marks in the entertainment industry that rely on trademark protection to sell official merchandise as a major revenue stream. This case confirmed that trademark owners can rely on the argument that well-known marks associated with fictional characters do not become generic or devoid of distinctive character only based on the association with such character made by the public. By contrast, the success of a mark and its widespread use in association with a fictional character support the trademark function of commercial origin and ensures that exclusive rights can be enforced long after the application date.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
7 August 2023

Batman Won Another (Trade Mark) Battle

UK Intellectual Property

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More