ARTICLE
15 February 2022

Podcast: Pension Disputes EP1 – Could M&B Judgment Undermine Validity Of Rule Amendments?

In the first podcast of our new Pension disputes series, Antonia Pegden, a Senior Associate in our disputes team, discusses the judgment handed down in the recent ...
UK Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In the first podcast of our new Pension disputes series, Antonia Pegden, a Senior Associate in our disputes team, discusses the judgment handed down in the recent Mitchells & Butlers rectification case with Pensions Professional Support Consultant, Tim Smith.

In this podcast, Antonia discusses:

  • why this judgment is significant;
  • the outcome of the bona fide purchaser defence, run by Mitchells & Butlers (the scheme's principal employer) for the first time in the context of a rectification claim; and
  • the impact of the judge's findings on what constitutes effective consultation with a scheme's actuary on the validity of historic and future rule amendments.]

To receive future podcasts in this series direct to your inbox subscribe to our UK pensions blog.

To view our other pensions podcasts, including the other podcasts in this series, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
15 February 2022

Podcast: Pension Disputes EP1 – Could M&B Judgment Undermine Validity Of Rule Amendments?

UK Employment and HR
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More