PRESS RELEASE
4 September 2023

MoFo Wins Summary Judgment For Shoreline Biosciences Against Patent Infringement Claims By Fate Therapeutics And Whitehead Institute

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contributor
Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
Morrison & Foerster won a total victory for Shoreline Biosciences Inc. against patent infringement claims brought by Fate Therapeutics Inc. and the Whitehead Institute in the Southern District of California.
United States
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Morrison & Foerster won a total victory for Shoreline Biosciences Inc. against patent infringement claims brought by Fate Therapeutics Inc. and the Whitehead Institute in the Southern District of California.The district court granted Shoreline's motion for summary judgement of non-infringement on each of Fate's and Whitehead's infringement claims.

Shoreline is a San Diego-based biotechnology company founded in May 2020 to develop induced pluripotent stem cell ("iPSC")-derived natural killer and macrophage cells to fight cancer.IPSCs were first developed in 2006 and 2007 by Japanese scientist Shinya Yamanaka and have since become widely available for scientific research and as a starting material for the development of cellular therapies.Dr. Yamanaka won the Nobel Prize in 2012 for his discovery of iPSCs. Shoreline has purchased several iPSC lines to develop its cellular therapies and to conduct research in support of its drug programs.

Fate and Whitehead filed their infringement claims against Shoreline in May 2022, alleging that Shoreline's use of iPSC lines manufactured by third-parties infringed seven patents Fate had licensed from Whitehead.The district court found during claim construction that the Whitehead patents do not cover iPSCs or the method of direct reprogramming of somatic cells to iPSCs invented by Dr. Yamanaka, but rather cover "priming" a somatic cell for reprogramming using a different method – somatic cell nuclear transfer ("SCNT").The district court found at summary judgment that because none of the iPSC lines purchased and used by Shoreline were made by "priming" a somatic cell for subsequent reprogramming using SCNT, there was no infringement of the Whitehead patents.

The Morrison & Foerster team is gratified that Shoreline has been cleared of these patent infringement allegations and can continue its efforts to develop cellular therapies to help patients fight cancer.

PRESS RELEASE
4 September 2023

MoFo Wins Summary Judgment For Shoreline Biosciences Against Patent Infringement Claims By Fate Therapeutics And Whitehead Institute

United States
Contributor
Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More