ARTICLE
27 October 2015

Key Points In Relation To The Return Of Schrems Case To The Irish High Court

M
Matheson

Contributor

Established in 1825 in Dublin, Ireland and with offices in Cork, London, New York, Palo Alto and San Francisco, more than 700 people work across Matheson’s six offices, including 96 partners and tax principals and over 470 legal and tax professionals. Matheson services the legal needs of internationally focused companies and financial institutions doing business in and from Ireland. Our clients include over half of the world’s 50 largest banks, 6 of the world’s 10 largest asset managers, 7 of the top 10 global technology brands and we have advised the majority of the Fortune 100.
Today, 20th October, the Schrems case returned for a hearing to the Irish High Court and these are the key points that arose...
Ireland Privacy
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Today, 20th October, the Schrems case returned for a hearing to the Irish High Court and these are the key points that arose:

  • Mr Schrems (who was present in Court and had his costs awarded) was keen for the Irish Data Protection Commissioner ("DPC") to begin its investigation as soon as possible in light of the delay since the case began and the possibility of the DPC delaying pending renegotiation of Safe Harbour;
  • Hogan J (the presiding Judge in the Irish High Court) held that the DPC had an independent duty to investigate and EU / US political developments that may or may not happen were irrelevant;
  • Counsel for the DPC stated that the DPC will investigate and there is no question of the investigation being delayed.  He stated that the DPC had no difficulty with any aspect of the CJEU decision;
  • Hogan J held that it was plain that the European Commission decision in relation to Safe Harbour was invalidated as a matter of EU law;
  • As stated in his first judgment, Hogan J reiterated that based on Irish constitutional standards, the DPC would have been obliged to investigate but for Safe Harbour;
  • The court held that there can be no criticism of the DPC in the circumstances for taking the view that the DPC's jurisdiction was pre-empted by the European Commission adequacy finding;
  • Now that Safe Harbour is invalidated the DPC's earlier decision not to investigate must be quashed;
  • The further determination of Mr Schrems' complaint and whether it is based on EU or Irish law is a matter for the DPC;
  • The DPC must respect fair procedures as a matter of Irish constitutional law and Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
  • Facebook applied to be joined in the proceedings insofar as they may be required for further orders or hearings. In the circumstances Facebook didn't press this application as the DPC investigation was the clear next step as agreed by all parties.

So, in a nutshell, the DPC will now investigate Facebook's EU to US data transfers so see whether or not they meet EU and Irish data privacy requirements. It will be interesting to see in that regard how much emphasis the DPC will put on the previous European Commission criticisms of the US data privacy regime including Safe Harbour: 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
27 October 2015

Key Points In Relation To The Return Of Schrems Case To The Irish High Court

Ireland Privacy

Contributor

Established in 1825 in Dublin, Ireland and with offices in Cork, London, New York, Palo Alto and San Francisco, more than 700 people work across Matheson’s six offices, including 96 partners and tax principals and over 470 legal and tax professionals. Matheson services the legal needs of internationally focused companies and financial institutions doing business in and from Ireland. Our clients include over half of the world’s 50 largest banks, 6 of the world’s 10 largest asset managers, 7 of the top 10 global technology brands and we have advised the majority of the Fortune 100.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More