Disclosure Of Telecommunications Data To Security Agencies – Unconstitutional

PC
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz

Contributor

Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz logo
Pearl Cohen is an international law firm with offices in Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Our strength is derived from decades of legal experience and an intimate knowledge of the cutting edge technological, legal, and transactional issues facing our clients in local and cross border matters. This combination of experience and knowledge allows us to provide sound and innovative advice to clients worldwide.
The German Constitutional Court has ruled that section 113 of the German Telecommunications Act, which supports the disclosure of information by telecommunications providers...
Germany Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The German Constitutional Court has ruled that section 113 of the German Telecommunications Act, which supports the disclosure of information by telecommunications providers to German security and intelligence agencies is unconstitutional and violates the fundamental right to privacy.

Section 113 stipulates that when asked to do so, telecommunications service providers must disclose to the German security authorities information about their users. This includes information collected as part of the contractual relationship with the customer (including date of birth and bank account information) as well as information about the customer's use of the services, such as the customer's dynamic IP address. Authorities may request this information when necessary for investigation or prosecution of a criminal or administrative offense, to protect public safety and public order, or to perform tasks assigned to the security agency by law.

The court's judgment explained that disclosing subscriber information is constitutionally permissible law only where it is performed with a legal basis, for a legitimate purpose and is proportionate considering the violation of the constitutional rights adversely affected by it. increasing the effectiveness of the security authorities' work and preventing crimes is a legitimate purpose, its implementation in the law lacks proportionality.

Per the court, the legislature is required to specify threshold requirements proportional to the expected violation of rights. For example, disclosing a person's dynamic IP address violates that person's right to privacy more significantly than disclosing information related to their contractual relationship with the service provider. Therefore, such disclosures can be justified only in cases of immediate danger or where factual circumstances provide specific grounds for the authority's use of these powers.

CLICK HERE to read the German Constitutional Court's press release.

Originally published by Pearl Cohen, July 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More