ARTICLE
4 October 2023

Crimes Committed By A Works Council Chairperson Do Not Necessarily Justify Refusal Of Access To Company Premises

LG
L&E Global

Contributor

L&E Global is spanning the globe and our member firms are ideally situated to provide clients with pragmatic, commercial advice necessary to achieve their objectives, wherever they operate. L&E Global’s members work closely with corporate, legal, human resources departments and corporate executives across a variety of sectors and industries to address the strategic and tactical issues that arise in the workplace
After it was discovered that the chairperson of the works council had forged certificates by using the employer's stamp to confirm receipt of works council documents, the employer reported...
Germany Criminal Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

After it was discovered that the chairperson of the works council had forged certificates by using the employer's stamp to confirm receipt of works council documents, the employer reported him to the police, denied him access to the company premises, and applied to the court for his removal from office. The works council, on the other hand, filed to court for the employer to be obliged to grant access to the company premises.

The local court granted the works council's motion and ordered the employer to grant the works council chairperson access to the premises. This ruling was recently confirmed by the Regional Court of Hesse. It found that the denial of access constituted an obstruction of the council's work. The Works Council Constitution Act (BetrVG) stipulates that members of the works council must not be obstructed in the performance of their duties.

In the event of a serious violation of duties committed by a works council member, the employer must still file for an interim injunction against the exercise of works council functions first. The criminal law dimension is not of interest for such an application. Instead, it depends on the question of whether the trustful relationship between the parties is irreversibly damaged. However, the actions of the works council chairperson were not considered a violation that would meet this threshold. The court, therefore, found that it was reasonable to wait for the impeachment proceedings to be concluded.

Practical Point

  • This ruling shows once more how strongly the position of the works council and its members is protected under German law. Even in the case of a criminal offence, the employer can be obligated to keep granting access to company premises for the purpose of works council work, until a court has ruled on the impeachment of the works council member in question. Not adhering to this can be considered an obstruction of the works council's work. 
  • In the meantime, employers can file for an interim injunction against the exercise of works council functions, but this will only be granted in exceptional cases. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
4 October 2023

Crimes Committed By A Works Council Chairperson Do Not Necessarily Justify Refusal Of Access To Company Premises

Germany Criminal Law

Contributor

L&E Global is spanning the globe and our member firms are ideally situated to provide clients with pragmatic, commercial advice necessary to achieve their objectives, wherever they operate. L&E Global’s members work closely with corporate, legal, human resources departments and corporate executives across a variety of sectors and industries to address the strategic and tactical issues that arise in the workplace
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More