Current filters:  
Canada
Litigation
Canada
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
On March 27, 2024, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released its much awaited decision in Palmer v. Teva. The decision sends a clear signal that claims based on weak science...
Reynolds Mirth Richards & Farmer
When picturing legal proceedings, many people envision dramatic courtroom trials with witnesses taking the stand. However, in Alberta, civil trials (unlike criminal trials) are rare.
Fasken
En tant que défendeur à une demande d'autorisation d'une action collective au Québec, vous venez d'apprendre que la Cour supérieure a autorisé l'exercice d'une action collective...
Miller Thomson LLP
Social media offers a platform for the sharing of information; however, the use of social media presents unique and significant legal challenges and potential liability...
Miller Thomson LLP
Litigation is often a lengthy and costly experience for those involved in commercial disputes. Parties often assume that if they are successful, their entire legal fees will be paid...
McCague Borlack LLP
In discussing limited rights of appeal pertaining to questions of law, The Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") in Yatar v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex unanimously...
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
On March 27, 2024, the Ontario Court of Appeal (Court) affirmed in Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd. (Palmer) that Canadian law does not provide remedies for an increased risk of harm.
Bennett Jones LLP
Ethan Schiff and Phoebe Goldig wrote an article for the Ontario Bar Association summarizing OCHC v. Sloan Valve Company, 2024 ONSC 1493.
Bennett Jones LLP
A recent decision of the Alberta Court of King's Bench in Orica Canada Inc v ARVOS GmbH, 2024 ABKB 97 [Orica] has attracted considerable attention among members of the arbitration bar.
WeirFoulds LLP
Rule 30.10 is a very powerful evidence-gathering tool. It empowers the Court to order a non-party to produce documents in their possession, power, or control that are relevant to ongoing litigation.
Dentons
In Larsen v. ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp., 2023 BCSC 1471 ("Larsen"), the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed the plaintiff's application to certify a proposed product liability class action.
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Regular followers of my blogs will probably have recognized that they often feature defamation cases and decisions rendered on anti-SLAPP motions. An anti-SLAPP motion (available in Ontario...
Rogers Partners LLP
In Denman v. Radovanovic, 2022 ONSC 4401, following a July 18, 2022, mid-trial voir dire, Justice Ferguson ordered the defence's expert Dr. Redekop excluded from testifying...
Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP
As arbitration practitioners will appreciate, the IBA's Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration are widely considered to be the authoritative resource on conflicts of interests for arbitrators; ...
DLA Piper
Having a clear plan in place is an essential element for success in an investigation. In this second part of our Canadian series "Focus on Investigations"...
Aird & Berlis LLP
The first quarter of 2024 saw the release of a number of important class action decisions which support the following principles...
CLC (Canadian Litigation Counsel)
The Court of Quebec recently ruled on this issue in Long BÉ Express Limited v. Service Routier ML Inc. and Intact Insurance Company.
Clark Wilson LLP
If you are separating or divorcing from a partner that you share children with, you may be wondering how a court determines where your children will live and how you and your former partner will divide parenting time.
MLT Aikins LLP
On November 10, 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada (the "SCC") released its decision in R v Greater Sudbury (City), 2023 SCC 28.
Tyr LLP
Join Tyr LLP for their upcoming webinar.
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Mondaq Social Media