Israeli Court Rules Bitcoin Is Not A Form Of Currency Exempted From Tax

PC
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz

Contributor

Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz logo
Pearl Cohen is an international law firm with offices in Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Our strength is derived from decades of legal experience and an intimate knowledge of the cutting edge technological, legal, and transactional issues facing our clients in local and cross border matters. This combination of experience and knowledge allows us to provide sound and innovative advice to clients worldwide.
The Israeli District Court in Lod delivered a landmark decision classifying Bitcoin as an asset subject to capital gains tax.
Israel Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Israeli District Court in Lod delivered a landmark decision classifying Bitcoin as an asset subject to capital gains tax. The decision was handed down in a dispute between the Israeli tax authority and the founder of a Blockchain-technology transportation startup.

The founder gained over 8 Million Israeli Shekels (nearly $2,500,000) in profits, by selling Bitcoin he had previously purchased. The founder argued that his profits are due to the fluctuating value of Bitcoin, which should be regarded as currency (exempt from Israeli taxes on fluctuations in its value), rather than an asset (subject to Israeli capital gains tax on fluctuations in its value).

The district court disagreed, finding that although the true nature of Bitcoin has yet to be determined, any conclusion finding that Bitcoin is a form of currency would be unacceptable. According to the court's decision, such a conclusion would be wholly inconsistent with the surrounding legal, economical and taxation environments. The court also indicated that Bitcoin, like any other virtual money, stands a long way from being treated as foreign currency subject to the same rules of taxation as traditional currencies. The founder now faces 3 Million Israeli Shekels (approximately $830,000) in taxes, as a result of this decision.

Click HERE to read the court decision (in Hebrew).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More