Federal Court Of Appeal Dismisses Appeal Of SPRAVATO "Innovative Drug" Decision

SB
Smart & Biggar
Contributor
Smart & Biggar uncovers and maximizes intellectual property and technology assets for our clients. Today’s fast-paced innovation economy demands a higher level of expertise and attention to detail when it comes to IP strategy and protection. With over 125 lawyers, patent agents and trademark agents collaborating across five Canadian offices, Smart & Biggar is trusted by the world’s leading innovators to find value in their IP rights. As market leaders in IP, Smart & Biggar’s team is on the pulse when it comes to the latest developments and the wider industry changes that impact our clients. To stay informed, visit smartbiggar.ca/insights, including access to our RxIP Update (smartbiggar.ca/insights/rx-ip-updates), a monthly digest of the latest decisions and law surrounding the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries.
On November 10, 2021, the Minister of Health refused to reassess its decision that Janssen's esketamine hydrochloride product (SPRAVATO)...
Canada Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On November 10, 2021, the Minister of Health refused to reassess its decision that Janssen's esketamine hydrochloride product (SPRAVATO) was not an "innovative drug" and therefore not entitled to data protection. As previously reported, the Federal Court dismissed Janssen's application for judicial review. On April 10, 2024, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Janssen's appeal for substantially the same reasons given by the Federal Court:Janssen Inc v Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FCA 66.

The Federal Court of Appeal expressly agreed with the Federal Court that the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA)did not changesubsection C.08.004.1(1) of the Food and Drug Regulations (Regulations), including the definition of "innovative drug". The Minister's interpretation remains reasonable. Other legal and political recourses are available ifsubsection C.08.004.1(1) does not conform with CUSMA including, as explained by the Federal Court, amendments to the Regulations by the Governor-in-Council.

Any further appeal would require leave to appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Pharmaceutical Litigation Group.

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

Federal Court Of Appeal Dismisses Appeal Of SPRAVATO "Innovative Drug" Decision

Canada Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Contributor
Smart & Biggar uncovers and maximizes intellectual property and technology assets for our clients. Today’s fast-paced innovation economy demands a higher level of expertise and attention to detail when it comes to IP strategy and protection. With over 125 lawyers, patent agents and trademark agents collaborating across five Canadian offices, Smart & Biggar is trusted by the world’s leading innovators to find value in their IP rights. As market leaders in IP, Smart & Biggar’s team is on the pulse when it comes to the latest developments and the wider industry changes that impact our clients. To stay informed, visit smartbiggar.ca/insights, including access to our RxIP Update (smartbiggar.ca/insights/rx-ip-updates), a monthly digest of the latest decisions and law surrounding the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More