ARTICLE
12 February 2021

Missed Opportunity For Clarity Around Termination Language: Supreme Court Declines To Hear Waksdale Appeal

C
CCPartners
Contributor
Workplace issues are complex, involving real people and difficult decisions. CCPartners is focused on providing exceptional service with a tailored approach to employers across all areas of Labour and Employment Law. We take the time to ask the right questions, understand your business, and help you achieve the outcomes that support your business goals.
Back in June of last year we wrote about an Ontario Court of Appeal decision that was, in a word, "troubling", for employers: Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391.
Canada Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Back in June of last year  we wrote about an Ontario Court of Appeal decision that was, in a word, "troubling", for employers:  Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391.  The problem from an employer's perspective was that the Court of Appeal essentially opened wide the door for plaintiffs – or more accurately their counsel – to challenge what would previously have been unassailable employment agreements. 

If you follow The Employers' Edge you know that there have been many changes to the law over the last decade when it comes to the enforceability of employment agreements; most specifically, numerous challenges have been upheld for various reasons when it comes to the validity of the all-important termination clause.  When Waksdale came out, it was hailed as a real game-changer by the plaintiff side, and bemoaned on the employer side as a further erosion of employer rights in employment contract drafting.

Unfortunately, the hoped-for clarity that the Supreme Court of Canada could have provided on this situation will not be forthcoming.  Without commenting as to the "why", the Supreme Court dismissed Swegon's Leave to Appeal Application, meaning that they will not hear the case.  Accordingly, the principles espoused in the Court of Appeal decision will continue to be relied upon by employee counsel in challenging contractual language at termination.

However, despite the Supreme Court declining to intervene, we – along with other employer counsel – do not believe Waksdale to be the death knell for employment agreements.  Certainly, going forward employers must be wary of how those agreements are worded: a task with which the  team at CCPartners can assist.  However, not every historical agreement is suddenly worthless: with Waksdale being mentioned in every demand letter, it is important to know that your employment agreement is not necessarily void just because your employee's lawyer cites that case.  In fact, there are certain factors that must be met in order for the reasoning in Waksdale to apply, so it is important to get  proper advice from legal experts based on the specific wording of your employment agreement before negotiating any termination package.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
12 February 2021

Missed Opportunity For Clarity Around Termination Language: Supreme Court Declines To Hear Waksdale Appeal

Canada Employment and HR
Contributor
Workplace issues are complex, involving real people and difficult decisions. CCPartners is focused on providing exceptional service with a tailored approach to employers across all areas of Labour and Employment Law. We take the time to ask the right questions, understand your business, and help you achieve the outcomes that support your business goals.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More