Are your casuals really casuals?

K
Kells

Contributor

Casual employees who work regular hours are likely to be considered permanent employees. Links to case & story.
Australia Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 20 May 2020 the Full Federal Court delivered its decision in WorkPac and Rossato. Here is a link to the case.

The court held that casual employees who work regular and systematic hours are likely to be considered permanent employees and entitled to annual leave and personal and carers leave. The court held that the payment of a loading did not operate to remove or offset the potential leave entitlements. The case confirmed the approach the court had taken in WorkPac and Skeene in August 2018.

Employer groups have indicated that an appeal to the High Court is likely. The Federal Government has also indicated that legislation may be introduced to reduce the potential effect of the case.

If you employ casuals and they work a regular and systematic shift pattern, you are potentially exposed to claims for payment of leave. You should review those contacts and obtain advice urgently.

Here is a link to a story on the case.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More